Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : P.N. Memorial Neuro Centre & Research Institute Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
P.N. Memorial Neuro Centre & Research Institute Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) When TDS Details Are Already Filed, AO Cannot Disallow on Guesswork- No TDS Default, No Disallowance – Presumption Isn’t Proof Assessee, a medical institution, faced three major disallowances u/s 40(a)(ia) for alleged non-deduction of TDS: ₹2,59,40,940 on miscellaneous expenses of ₹8,64,69,802; ₹1,62,66,583 on incentive payments of ₹5,42,21,943; & ₹1,02,32,441 on sales-promotion expenses of ₹3,41,08,137. AO presumed that these expenses attracted TDS u/s 194J/194H & disallowed 30% of each...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930