Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abani Ranjan Maity Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Abani Ranjan Maity Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Delay of 75 Days Condoned—Uneducated Assessee Relied on Negligent Consultant; Ex-Parte 144 Assessment & Additions u/s 69/69A Restored for Fresh Hearing For AY 2013-14, the Assessee filed return declaring ₹4,13,519. The AO reopened the case u/s 147 and issued notice u/s 148 on 19.03.2020. There was no compliance to this or to subsequent 142(1) notices. A final show-cause dated 13.09.2021 also went unanswered, and the AO completed assessment ex-parte u/s 144, making heavy additions: ₹50,00,000 treated as unexplained investment u/s 69 (property p...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930