This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Rejects AO’s Demand for Third-Party Documents; Section 68 Addition Deleted
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Jay Kundan Bhatt Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2020-2021
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Jay Kundan Bhatt Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Section 68 Cannot Tax Past-Year Figures; Third-Party Books Not Required from Assessee—Identity & Genuineness Already Proved
Assessee’s assessment u/s 143(3) resulted in additions of Rs.22,45,300 u/s 68 towards unsecured loans, including Rs.6,45,300 being difference in loan balance with his father, Shri Kundan Bhatt. Tribunal noted from ledger accounts & earlier assessment orders (AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20) that the same difference of Rs.6,45,300 was repeatedly added in past years but deleted by CIT(A) as it did not arise from any transactions o...






