Case Law Details

Case Name : Thyrocare Technologies Limited vs. ITO (TDS), Mumbai (Mumbai High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 53 and 54 of 2016, W.P. No. 730 and 847 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 11.09.2017
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (6127) Bombay High Court (1078)
Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah

ITAT has to reappraise and reappreciate all the factual materials placed before it: Tribunal duty bound for the same, rules Bombay High Court

The issues of fact determined by the Tribunal remain final and the High Court in exercise of its reference jurisdiction should not act as an appellate Court to review such findings of fact arrived at by the Tribunal by a process of reappreciation and reappraisal of the evidence on record.

It was held by Supreme Court in Karnani Properties Ltd vs. CIT [1972 AIR 2315, 1972 SCR (1) 457] that it is for the Tribunal to find facts and it is for the High Court and this Court to lay down the law applicable to the facts found. Neither the High Court nor this Court has jurisdiction, to go behind or to question the statements of facts made by the Tribunal.

Recently, in Thyrocare Technologies Limited, Mumbai vs. ITO (TDS), Mumbai [ITA No. 53 and 54 of 2016 with W.P. No. 730 and 847 of 2016, decided on 11.09.2017], on the facts & circumstances of the case, the learned Judges of the Bombay High Court have held that we   are most unhappy with the manner in which the Tribunal has decided these Appeals. We have no alternative but to set aside such order and when the last fact finding authority misdirects itself totally in law. It fails to perform its duty.   It has also not rendered a complete decision.  Once the Tribunal was obliged in law to examine the matter and reappraise and reappreciate all the factual materials, then it should have performed that duty satisfactorily and in terms of the powers conferred by law.

Once this duty is not performed, we can safely come to the conclusion that the Tribunal’s order  is vitiated by not only total non­application   of   mind   but   also   misdirection   in   law.   We accordingly   conclude   and   proceed   to   set   aside   the   impugned order. We direct the Tribunal to hear the Appeals afresh on merits and in accordance with law after giving complete opportunity to both sides   to place their versions and arguments.  The Tribunal shall frame proper points for its determination and consideration and render specific findings on each of them. The Tribunal should carry   out   this   exercise   uninfluenced   by   any   observations   or conclusions in the impugned order which we have quashed and set aside.  We clarify that beyond emphasizing what   is   the real controversy and which question goes to the root of the matter, we have not expressed any opinion on the rival contentions.  All of them are open for being raised before the Tribunal.

Download Judgment/Order

More Under Income Tax

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

December 2020
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031