Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Mumbai Quashed Section 68 Addition Due to Evidence of Inherited Jewellery

Case Law Details

Case Name
Priyanka Lalitkumar Raizada Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2014-15
Advertisement
Priyanka Lalitkumar Raizada Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) considered an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, which had upheld an assessment framed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2014–15. The core dispute related to an addition of ₹21,50,540 made under Section 68 of the Act by treating the sale proceeds of jewellery as unexplained cash credits. The appeal before the Tribunal was filed with a delay of 490 day...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 17,295

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *