Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Mumbai: Depreciation on Trademark Allowed-AO Cannot Revisit Claim in Subsequent Years

Case Law Details

Case Name
DCIT Vs Transworld Furtichem Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Transworld Furtichem Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai ITAT held that once depreciation on an intangible asset such as a trademark has been allowed in the first year after due scrutiny, the Assessing Officer cannot disallow the same in subsequent years without any change in facts. In this case, the assessee acquired a trademark pursuant to an amalgamation approved by the NCLT and claimed depreciation under Section 32. The claim was examined and accepted in the first year (AY 2016–17). However, in subsequent years, the AO disallowed depreciation alleging that the trademark was ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,493

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *