Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Devisha Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Devisha Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Section 41(1) Can’t Be Invoked Merely Because Creditor Writes Off Liability; Capitalised Expenses Need Verification: ITAT Mumbai Grants Major Relief Mumbai ITAT granted substantial relief to the Assessee, a real-estate developer, by deleting a major addition u/s 41(1) and remanding the expenditure issue for limited verification. AY 2019-20 – Section 41(1) (₹10.23 Cr): The AO treated an outstanding balance of ₹10.23 crore payable to M/s Blue Circle Infratech as cessation of liability u/s 41(1), solely because the creditor had written...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930