Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Om Kar Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Om Kar Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi quashes reassessment—AO wrongly assumed no return filed; mechanical 148 notice held invalid Delhi annulled the reassessment, holding that the notice u/s 148 was issued without application of mind on a wrong premise that Assessee had not filed any return. AO reopened the case based on NMS data showing large cash deposits of ₹15.21 crore, assuming no ITR was filed. In reality, Assessee had filed return on 15-09-2017, a fact even acknowledged later in the assessment order. ITAT found that reopening was entirely mechanical & factually incorrect, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930