Case Law Details
Dharmendrakumar B Mehta Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) of Ahmedabad recently ruled in favor of the appellant, Dharmendrakumar B Mehta, deleting the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The case revolved around an accountant’s error leading to the non-disclosure of income in the appellant’s Income Tax Return (ITR), which resulted in the imposition of penalties.
This case brought to light the fact that mistakes by a third party such as an accountant could lead to severe penalties for the assessee, despite the non-deliberate nature of the error. The appellant had failed to disclose certain elements of income, leading to the imposition of a penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The ITAT considered the extenuating circumstances surrounding the case, particularly the ill-health of the accountant responsible for preparing the ITR. Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in the Price Waterhouse Cooper Pvt. Ltd. case, the ITAT ruled that a mistake by the accountant should not be treated as the mistake of the assessee.
This ruling by ITAT Ahmedabad sets an important precedent for future cases involving errors by third parties during the preparation of income tax returns. It underlines the importance of understanding the circumstances surrounding errors or omissions in tax filings and raises questions about accountability when such errors occur.
FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT AHMEDABAD
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
