Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rishi L Anandani Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rishi L Anandani Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur) GST Clients’ Cash ≠ Unexplained Money— Advocate’s Bank Deposits Were Clients’ Tax Money – No Enquiry, No Evidence, No 69A-  ITAT Deletes 69A Addition Assessee, an advocate practicing in Income Tax & GST, declared income of Rs.3,98,320. Case was selected for limited scrutiny to verify cash deposits during demonetisation. AO added Rs.4,49,000 u/s 69A as unexplained money, holding that Assessee failed to give acceptable explanation for deposits of Rs.3,41,000 in current account & Rs.45,000 in savings account in old currency. Assessee ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld No Exempt Income = No U/s 14A Disallowance – ITAT Bangalore Reaffirms Settled Law ITAT Bangalore Quashes Sec 263 Revision: No Error in Valuation & No Need to Initiate Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930