This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Bangalore deletes Bogus Purchase addition in Section 44AD Case
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Lakshmanram Bheemaji Purohit Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Lakshmanram Bheemaji Purohit Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Assessee is an individual engaged in the business of trading of waste home products filed his return of income as per provisions of section 44AD. Information was received that assessee has received bogus purchase bill of Rs.16,09,692 from one ARS Enterprises. It is alleged that this is a bogus tax invoice wherein false input credit was claimed under GST. When the draft order was passed assessee objected that the addition draft order does not mention the section under which the addition/ disallowance is made. With respect to the details of ...




