Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Birla Corporation Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. Nos.: 494 & 495/Kol/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/10/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12 & 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Birla Corporation Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

ITAT Kolkata held that interest subsidy received under the amended Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme, 2003 is capital receipt and hence the same is not chargeable to tax.

Facts-

The Department’s appeal relates to the assessee’s claim that interest subsidy, since renamed “Capital Investment Subsidy”, of Rs. 3,04,22,210/- received under the amended Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme, 2003 in respect of expansion undertaken at the assessee’s Chanderia Cement Works should be treated as a capital receipt. The AO held that the subsidy was incidental to carrying on of the business of the assessee and treated the same as revenue receipt. On appeal, the CIT(A) held it to be a capital receipt by following the Tribunal’s decision in assessee’s own case.

Conclusion-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031