Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : D.C.I.T Vs M/s. Rungta Mines Ltd (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs M/s. Rungta Mines Ltd (ITAT Kolkata) Conclusion: Interest expenses claimed by assessee on account of delayed deposit of TDS liability was allowable under section 37(1) as the TDS amount did not represent the tax of  assessee but it was the tax of the party which had been paid by assessee. Held: In the present case, AO disallowed deduction of interest on late deposits of TDS liability. It was held TDS amount did not represent tax of assessee but it was tax of party, on whose behalf it was deducted and paid to the Government Exchequer. Thus, any delay in payment of TDS by assessee could...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930