Information given by DIT (Inv) can only be a reason to suspect not reason to believe

Devansh Exports Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata)

 From the aforesaid reasons it is evident that other than the vague information given by DIT (inv) there is no other material the AO collected after preliminary enquiry which could have enabled him at the time of recording reasons to come to a conscious independent conclusion that “income of the assessee has escaped assessment”. The information given by DIT(Inv) can only be a basis to ignite/trigger “reason to suspect” for which reop

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.