Case Law Details
Case Name : Minda Investments Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
In CIT vs. Hero Cycles 323 ITR 518 (P&H) it was held that dis allowance u/s 14A required finding of incurring of expenditure and where it was found that for earning exempted income no expenditure had been incurred, disallowance u/s 14A could not stand. On the other hand, in Godrej Boyce Mfg. Co 328 ITR 81 (Bom) it was held that the AO could adopt a reasonable basis to identify the expenses in relation to the earning of exempt income;
Rule 8D does not apply to AY 2006-07. The assessee has urged that no expenditure has been
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.