CA. M. Lakshmanan

Under the present system of limited scrutiny under CASS (Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection) Income Taxes Cases are selected for hearing under various parameters and assessments are made basing on the books of account and evidences produced. Further notices are sent to assessees basing on information collected from the Annual Information Returns (AIR) and verified whether Returns of Incomes were filed and the income returned is correct with respect to the information collected.

As of now more time is spent on the scrutinizing the returns filed than the time spent in roping new cases. More the ‘Income Returned’, more the chances of getting enquiry and hearing. It is to be avoided. By existing practice the ‘scrutiny assessments’ have to be completed necessarily by increasing the income returned either by disallowing certain expenditure or by enhancing the income earned, which results in additional taxes with interest and penalty proceedings. As a custom the income returned is not accepted and the Assessee/Representative is requested to attend the Income Tax Office many-a-times. Because of this attitude, physiological fear arises among assessees, which is deterrent for the cordial relationship between the Assessing Officer and the Assessee. Hence there is misconception among assessees that if they file returns voluntarily they will be subjected to rowing enquiry. So they wait till a compelling situation arises. If this is taken care, more people will come forward to file returns of income voluntarily. Of course the assessees should be aware of the fact that if there is willful default or concealment appropriate action would be taken by the Department.

Many of the properties are sold by registered documents up to Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) without PAN of the buyer and seller and there is a chance that such transactions may escape the attention of the Income Tax Department. Hence PAN should be made compulsory for registration of documents carrying value of above Rs. 1 Lakh. At present the public receive notice after a long time after they registered the documents exceeding Rs. 30 Lakhs basing on the information available in the AIR. But this value (reporting under AIR) should be reduced to Rs. 1 lakh and the notices should be sent as early as possible. If the capital gains arising there from are offered as Income and the taxes are paid in time, the assessees can save the interest they are paying due to nonpayment of Advance Tax and belated filing of return of income after receipt of notice and they need not be subjected to penalty proceedings also. They can avoid capital gains tax by investing the proceeds/gains in approved securities or in house property before the stipulated time, if they are eligible provided they are alerted in time. This will also help to increase and the tax revenue

Presently people have accounts with various Banks and give 15G/H knowing very well that their income is more than the maximum non-taxable limits if all the interest from all the Banks are clubbed together and naturally they would have given PAN also to all the Banks. Till now notices are sent to those who have not filed their returns of income and not claimed the TDS if TDS is made by the Banks either due to non submission of Form 15G/H or by mistake by Banks without looking into the Form 15G/H submitted. Since people are giving PAN/Form 60/61 indiscriminately, the system should be made foolproof by collecting all the data about a particular individual from various sources and proceed against suspected evaders. Now it is felt that the Government has equipped itself with the system of integrating all the data (not only Bank deposits but also various financial transactions where PAN is mandatory) under single PAN from various sources and if it works, more people can be roped in. For example if a car is purchased or an investment is made under single PAN, all should be clubbed and action should be taken based on the results.

Another area is submission of Form 61/61A by people at various situations where PAN is required or otherwise they can give these forms. Though either Form 61 or Form 61A is to be obtained many get both the forms without filling the same and it is not known whether any authority is monitoring about the obtention and submission of the same with the Income Tax Department and further action taken on the forms so submitted. If more time is spent on this issue more assessees can be roped in. All the Form 60/61 given at various locations by a person should be clubbed with the help of ‘id proof’ or ‘Address Proof’ or ‘Adhar Card’.

Often it is reported that the percentage of people who pay taxes in India is too low; but it is to be seen how far we concentrate on roping in new assessees is a big question. The above areas wherein new assessees can be roped are only very few. Constantly a team of experienced officials have to device ways and means to rope in new cases basing on the past records and the present trend and close the doors for those who try to evade tax. In the long run, I think the goal can be achieved.

Read Other Articles of CA M. Lakshmanan

Author Bio

More Under Income Tax

Posted Under

Category : Income Tax (25503)
Type : Articles (14970)

6 responses to “How Income Tax Base can be widened”

  1. K. SURESH says:

    As a retired employee of the I.T.Dept..I suggest one more area to be brought into new tax net. This is where the house owners collect the rent only in cash & not otherwise. This leads to large volume of tax evasion by non-disclosure of rental income or under-declaration of rental income. To curb this malpractice, I.T.law needs to be amended suitably to direct the tenants to deposit the rent directly into the bank account of the owners, irrespective of the quantum of rent. The I.T.Dept.may obtain the rental deposit data from the concerned bank by referring to owners PAN. Banks may devise suitable challans having owner`s PAN column in it obtained compulsorily for receipt of rental amount remitted by the tenants. Production of Form No.61/61A by the house owners should be discontinued and in its place, house owners must be asked to obtain PAN & give it to their bankers & tenants to enable remittance of rent directly into the owner`s bank account. There should not be any oral rent agreement but only in writing on a stamp paper with owner`s PAN compulsorily stated therein.

  2. VINOD KUMAR GUPTA says:

    Agree with your opinion, this should be impelled, certainly it would be helped in roping in tax payer.

  3. GKRISHNA says:

    The author’s contention that roping in by transactions. Just catching small fishes won’t be sufficient. There are huge crocodiles at large who have already parked huge sums in tax heavens outside our country. Since they are having high connections with our political circles, they have all escaped till now. No palpable logical action seems to have been taken against them. But those who are earning by their hard work toiling throughout their life and saving them in their bank accounts are subjected to unnecessary hassles. Further, the departments are being outsourced and quality work force is not allowed to be created in the departments. Just by spending on luxuries on politicians by giving unnecessary security, salaries, perks, subsidies and pensions and stopping pension for the govt. employees categorised unproductive,whereas it is the case of the politicians who cyphons of the exchequer and parks it outside this country who are left Scot free by this system whereas the general hapless public who cannot escape from the eye of law are squeezed by various checks and balances when they are at their fag end of their life spending their hard earned money for their shear survival and for their ailments.

    • CA. M. Lakshmanan says:

      Every Citizen of India is empowered to voice their concern in catching Big Fishes; Anybody can suggest ways to tax the money earned from tax heavens and parked in foreign countries. Since majority of the Political Bosses, either ‘ruling party’ or ‘opposition party’ are connected with the ‘Tax Heavens’ in some way or other there is no progress in catching them. But that does not mean that one need not take into cognizance the small evaders who are large in number. Evasion is evasion either big or small! Big Fishes break the net and small fishes get through the wholes.

  4. T V KUMAR says:

    Good, useful article. Can I contact Mr. Lakshmanan for future tax-related queries, in any? If so, please send me the contact details to my below email ID.
    Thanks and regards
    T V Kumar

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *