This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
HC order without framing substantial question of law and without passing reasoned order is invalid
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CIT Vs M/s Rashtradoot (HUF) (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 1987-Â88 to 1996-Â97
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
CIT Vs M/s Rashtradoot (HUF) (Supreme Court)
Conclusion: High Court in the absence of any discussion or/and the reasoning/ground as to why the order of ITAT did not suffer from any illegality and why the grounds of Revenue were not acceptable and why the appeal did not involve any substantial question(s) of law or though framed could not be answered in Revenue’s favour, the impugned order dismissing the Revenue’s appeal suffered from jurisdictional errors and, therefore, legally unsustainable for want of compliance of the requirements of sub-sections (4) and (5) of Section 260A.
Held:Â...




