Gold Jewellery Seized u/s 132A Held Explained – Addition u/s 69 r.w.s. 115BBE Deleted
CA Vijayakumar Shetty
08 Jan 2026
150 Views
1 comment
Print
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Income Tax |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Income Tax |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 80
Case Law Details
Case Name : S. Chandra Prakash Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
S. Chandra Prakash Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
The Chennai ITAT (C Bench) partly allowed the appeal of S. Chandra Prakash for AY 2021-22, holding that the gold jewellery seized under section 132A was duly explained and that the addition made under section 69 r.w.s. 115BBE was unsustainable.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
Comments are closed.