Admittedly, the assessee is not a dealer in foreign exchange. For the purpose of hedging the loss due to fluctuation in foreign exchange while implementing the export contracts, the assessee had entered into forward contract with the banks. In some cases, the export could not be executed and the assessee had to pay certain charges to the Bank and thereby incurred certain expenses. These expenses the assessee claimed by way of expenditure towards business. We do not find that the transaction can be stated to be in speculation as to cover under sub-section (5) of section 43 of the Act.
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
TAX APPEAL NO. 131 of 2013
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus
PANCHMAHAL STEEL LTD.
Date : 28/03/2013
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONORABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
1.Revenue is in appeal against the judgement of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 13.7.2012 raising following questions for our consideration :
“Whether, the Tribunal erred in deleting dis allowance of Rs. 34,88,834/- made on account of loss claimed due to cancellation of forward contract thereby over viewing the fact that transactions in question fell within the definition of speculative transaction as per section 43(5) of the Income Tax Act?
2. Tribunal in the impugned judgement relied on its own decision in case of Friends and friends Shipping Pvt. Ltd. which was carried in appeal before this Court. This Court had also by judgement 23.8.2011 in Tax Appeal No. 251/2010 upheld the decision of the Tribunal. In the said judgement, this Court had made following observations :



