Case Law Details
License fee, Connectivity charges and co-ordination charges paid to a US based company GE Capital Corporation for use of ‘Vision Plus’ software held to be revenue in nature and allowable under section 37
Whether a particular expenditure is of a nature of capital or revenue, depends to a large extent upon facts and circumstances of the case. Help is also taken from the decided cases as the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) does not define capital or a revenue expenditure. Recently, in D.C.I.T. vs. G.E. Capital Business Process Management Services Pvt. Ltd [ITA No. 6836/Del./2014, decided on 05.10.2017], on an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the CIT(A) for the A.Y.2010-11, one of the ground raised before ITAT, New Delhi was that whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in deleting the aggregate disallowance of Rs. 3,69,40,306/- on account of License fee, Connectivity charges and co-ordination charges paid to a US based company GE Capital Corporation for use of ‘Vision Plus’ software holding the same as revenue in nature and allowable under section 37 of the Act.
Briefly, in respect of the issue, the assessee company was engaged in carrying out back end operations of this activity, i.e, transaction processing on cards, billing, updating of collections, statements of account, resolving card-members queries etc. AO observed that the assessee has paid Rs.3,69,40,306/- to GE Capital Corporation USA for use of Vision Plus Software as per end user license agreement dated 07.07.2000. the AO was of the view that the license to the software provides enduring benefit to the assessee and therefore, held the payments in pursuance of the end user license agreement as capital in nature and therefore, disallowed the license fee and data service management charges paid to GE Capital Corporation, USA for use of software aggregating to Rs.3,69,40,306/- and completed the assessment. Aggrieved by the additions, the assessee appealed before the first appellate authority who after considering the submissions of the assessee and remand report called from the AO, deleted both the additions. Against the order of CIT(A), the Revenue filed appeal before the ITAT, New Delhi.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
