This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Expenses on eye treatment abroad not allowable u/s 37 being not exclusively incurred for profession
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Dhimant Hiralal Thakar Vs CIT (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Brief of the Case
Bombay High Court held In the case of Dhimant Hiralal Thakar vs. CIT that eyes are an important organ of the human body and is essential for the efficient survival of a human being. Eyes are thus essential not only for the purpose of business or profession but for purposes other than these which are so many. It is therefore clear that the said expenditure as claimed by the applicant is not in the nature of the expenditure wholly and exclusively incurred for the purposes of the profession of the applicant and thus this expenditure cannot be claimed u/s Section 37.
Facts of the...
