Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Aliveni Gurram Vs ITO (ITO Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Aliveni Gurram Vs ITO (ITO Hyderabad) Entire cash deposits can’t be branded as 69A income of bank agent: ITAT orders fresh probe ITAT Hyderabad set aside ex-parte reassessment order wherein entire cash deposits of ₹1.02 crore were treated as unexplained money u/s 69A. Assessee, an authorised Business Correspondent of State Bank of Hyderabad, contended that cash deposits represented collections from villagers on behalf of bank & her real income was only commission of about ₹1.06 lakh. Tribunal noted that assessment as well as first appellate order were completed ex-parte without exami...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai WhatsApp Chats Accepted as Evidence, On-Money Addition Limited to 25%: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031