Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name :  Matrix Automotive Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Matrix Automotive Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Accountant & AR Exit – Reasonable Cause Accepted; Ex-parte Additions for Unsecured Loan & Partner’s Capital Set Aside- Rule 46A Relief: ITAT Restores Case as Evidence Rejected by NFAC Without Sufficient Cause Assessee, a partnership firm engaged in Yamaha two-wheeler dealership, filed its return declaring a loss of ₹51.45 lakh. The case was selected for limited scrutiny to verify (i) large increase in unsecured loans &  (ii) loans from non-filers. During assessment, AO sought details of ₹3 crore unsecured loans (from Shri Rushi C. Ma...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930