Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vibgyor Tech Solutions Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2136/Kol/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/08/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Vibgyor Tech Solutions Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

The issue under consideration is whether ex parte order passed by CIT(A) because of non attendance of assessee on the date of hearing is justified in law?

ITAT states that the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) is ex parte and assessee/ assessee’s Ld. Counsel was not heard before disposal of the appeal. The Ld. CIT(A) noted that he had fixed the appeal on two occasions i.e on 04/05//2018 and 21/05/2018; and since none appeared, he was pleased to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. It has to be kept in mind that if an assessee is aggrieved by an order of the Assessing Office (AO), then the assessee has a valuable right to file an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), who is duty bound to decide the appeal ground wise on merits. In case if the assessee does not turn up for whatever reasons, then the Ld. CIT(A) ought to have called for assessment folder/records from the AO and then decide the grounds on merits. If the Ld. CIT(A) dismisses the appeal without going into the merits of the case, then the statutory right of appeal vested with the assessee will become meaningless. I note that the Ld. CIT(A) has stated that though the notices were issued, it could not be served upon the assessee since it was returned back with the postal remark ‘Left’. Therefore, CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of assessee ex parte without going into the merits of the ground raised by the assessee. However, ITAT note that address of assessee company given in the assessment order as well as in the Form 36 filed before this Tribunal is different. Thus, ITAT note that there is a change in address. Therefore, they presume that notice(s) has not been served upon the assessee, since there is change in address. In the light of above discussion, ITAT is of the opinion that the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) is bad for violation of natural justice. Therefore, they set aside the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) and remand the matter back to him for fresh adjudication.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-2, Kolkata dated 05-06-2018 for the assessment year 2013-14.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031