Even under Rule 8D of S.14A, disallowance can be made only if there is actual nexus between tax-free income and expenditure

SUMMARY OF THE CASE LAW

The assessee earned dividend income on shares which was exempt from tax. The AO took the view that the investment in shares was made out of borrowed funds on which interest expenditure was incurred and consequently made a disallowance u/s 14A. This was partly upheld by the CIT (A). On further appeal by the assessee, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance by noting that the assessee had proved that the investment in shares was made

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.