This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
DRP not empowered to set aside any proposed variation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- PCIT Vs Moet Hennessy (I) Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
PCIT Vs Moet Hennessy (I) Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
The Assessee in its appeal before ITAT contended that as per Section 144C(8) of the Act, DRP may confirm, reduce or enhance the variation proposed in the draft order. However, DRP is not empowered to set aside any proposed variation or issue any direction under Section 144C(5) for further enquiry for passing the assessment order and therefore, the disallowance proposed under Section 37 (1) of the Act was without jurisdiction.
The ITAT agreed with the contention of the Assessee that the direction of the DRP to AO for determ...





