Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Budge Budge Company Ltd Vs CIT (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A No 175 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/05/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Brief of the case:

Calcutta High Court Held in the case of  M/s Budge Budge Company Ltd Vs CIT if the business had been suspended for some period of time without any malice contention of the assesse and the plant was still ready for use during that suspended period also, then the depreciation would be allowed to the assesse for that suspended period.

Hon’ble High Court Held in M/s Budge Budge Company Ltd Vs CIT that if the expenditure had been incurred by the assesse which gave an advantage for enduring benefit due to which the assesse ‘s asset value would increase then that expenditure would be treated as a capital expenditure not revenue expenditure.

Facts of the case:

AO had disallowed depreciation of Rs 32,77,267/- on the basis that there was no work running in the factory and the work was suspended. Moreover machinery was kept ready for use and factory resumed operation after some period of time.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031