Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Smt. Datta Mahendra Shah, (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal no 1601 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/09/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief of the case

In the case of CIT vs. Smt.Datta Mahendra Shah, Bombay High court held that once department has accepted decision of ITAT given in case of assessee’s son then decision given by ITAT on identical fact in assessee case has also to be accepted by department, since department works as a single unit and it cannot argue that different treatment is to be given merely because the officers dealing with the two files are different.

Facts of the case

1. Assessee is a senior citizen having income on account of capital gains, business income and income from other sources. The Assessing Officer was of the view that the amount claimed short term capital gains of Rs.9.25 crores was in fact business income and has to be taxed.

2. AO has held that taken this view based on the following point:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031