Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satendra Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Satendra Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

Assessee, a civil contractor, deposited Rs.30.49 lakh in SBNs during demonetization. AO made addition of entire cash deposit of Rs.31.38 lakh u/s 68, rejecting explanation that deposits were sourced from cash withdrawals by Assessee & his son, both engaged in construction business.

CIT(A) held that withdrawals made months earlier could not be treated as kept idle till November 2016 & confirmed addition.

Before Tribunal, Assessee produced complete bank statements showing aggregate cash withdra

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income Carbon Credit Sale Treated as Capital Receipt, Not Taxable Income Search Assessments Quashed for Lack of Prior U/s 153D Approval View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031