Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dilbag Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Dilbag Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)

ITAT Chandigarh dealt with addition of ₹3.19 Lakh u/s 69 r.w.s. 115BBE out of total demonetization-period cash deposit of ₹14.19 Lakh. AO accepted agricultural income to that extent & added the balance ₹3.19 Lakh as unexplained.

CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Assessee did not appear before Tribunal. Tribunal noted that Assessee himself admitted inability to explain source of ₹3.19 Lakh; hence the addition could not be deleted. However, Tribunal held that the enhanced rate of 60% u/s 115BBE is not appl

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Ex-Parte Appellate Orders Set Aside for Lack of Merits Review Mandatory Injunction Barred When Title and Possession Are Disputed Rejection of Motion in One House Does Not Stall Judge Inquiry CPC Cannot Treat Form 3CD Entries as Final Without Verification Wrong Valuation Report Leads to Capital Gains Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031