Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dilbag Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Dilbag Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)

ITAT Chandigarh dealt with addition of ₹3.19 Lakh u/s 69 r.w.s. 115BBE out of total demonetization-period cash deposit of ₹14.19 Lakh. AO accepted agricultural income to that extent & added the balance ₹3.19 Lakh as unexplained.

CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Assessee did not appear before Tribunal. Tribunal noted that Assessee himself admitted inability to explain source of ₹3.19 Lakh; hence the addition could not be deleted. However, Tribunal held that the enhanced rate of 60% u/s 115BBE is not appl

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income Carbon Credit Sale Treated as Capital Receipt, Not Taxable Income Search Assessments Quashed for Lack of Prior U/s 153D Approval Documented and Repaid Unsecured Loans Cannot Be Treated as Accommodation Entries u/s 68 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031