Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Master General Store Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Master General Store Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar) Order sent to wrong counsel, appeal dismissed ex-parte: ITAT condones 458-day delay & restores demonetisation cash-deposit case Amritsar ITAT condoned an inordinate delay of 458 days & restored the appeal to the file of CIT(A) after finding clear breach of natural justice. Tribunal noted that CIT(A)’s order dated 24-11-2023 was never served on the assessee & was instead emailed to the earlier counsel, who failed to inform the assessee about disposal of the appeal. As a result, the appeal before CIT(A) was dismissed ex-parte without adju...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930