Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Master General Store Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Master General Store Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)

Order sent to wrong counsel, appeal dismissed ex-parte: ITAT condones 458-day delay & restores demonetisation cash-deposit case

Amritsar ITAT condoned an inordinate delay of 458 days & restored the appeal to the file of CIT(A) after finding clear breach of natural justice. Tribunal noted that CIT(A)’s order dated 24-11-2023 was never served on the assessee & was instead emailed to the earlier counsel, who failed to inform the assessee

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

153A Assessments Void Without Prior 153D Approval; Post-Facto Sanction Cannot Cure Defect Documented and Repaid Unsecured Loans Cannot Be Treated as Accommodation Entries u/s 68 No TPO Variation, No DRP Route: Assessment u/s 144C Quashed as Without Jurisdiction TDS Credit Cannot Be Denied Due to Reporting Mismatch Section 68 Additions Rejected as Loan Repayment and Cash Sales Explained View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031