Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kempareddy Govindraj Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kempareddy Govindraj Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Planted Diary Can’t Speak: Bangalore ITAT Deletes Massive 153A Additions- Loose Notings ≠ Income: Search Additions Fall for Want of Corroboration- Dumb Documents Don’t Create Tax Liability: 153A Additions Based on Diary Entries Quashed for Lack of Evidence Bangalore ITAT “B” Bench, in Kempareddy Govindraj Vs ACIT (ITA Nos. 1021–1024/Bang/2024 for AYs 2013-14 to 2016-17 & ITA Nos. 1290–1292/Bang/2024 for AYs 2014-15 to 2016-17; order dated 31.01.2025), examined wide-ranging challenges to search assessments framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930