Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kempareddy Govindraj Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kempareddy Govindraj Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Planted Diary Can’t Speak: Bangalore ITAT Deletes Massive 153A Additions- Loose Notings ≠ Income: Search Additions Fall for Want of Corroboration- Dumb Documents Don’t Create Tax Liability: 153A Additions Based on Diary Entries Quashed for Lack of Evidence Bangalore ITAT “B” Bench, in Kempareddy Govindraj Vs ACIT (ITA Nos. 1021–1024/Bang/2024 for AYs 2013-14 to 2016-17 & ITA Nos. 1290–1292/Bang/2024 for AYs 2014-15 to 2016-17; order dated 31.01.2025), examined wide-ranging challenges to search assessments framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930