Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil Kumar Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Anil Kumar Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)

Assessee was assessed u/s 153A. AO made addition of Rs.14,73,895 u/s 69C treating furniture expenditure incurred by Assessee’s wife, Smt. Alka Jain, as unexplained. Before CIT(A)/NFAC, Assessee furnished complete evidences—ITRs of wife from AY 2013-14 to AY 2020-21, computation statements & balance sheets—to prove source of funds & her financial capacity. CIT(A)/NFAC accepted that Smt. Alka Jain had sufficient capital & financial strength, but mis-read the balance sheet by treating only cash in hand of Rs.4,24,240 as the avail

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

IBC Section 7: SC Holds CIRP Admission Mandatory Once Debt & Default Proved; Society Intervention Denied ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes On-Money Additions; Loose Papers Insufficient Entire Bogus Purchase Disallowance Rejected When Books Not Rejected: ITAT Pune Appeal Cannot Be Dismissed for Typographical Error in Form 35: ITAT Hyderabad Agricultural Income Estimation Scaled Down: ITAT Rajkot Restricts Addition to ₹50,000 on Ad-hoc Basis View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031