Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil Kumar Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anil Kumar Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur) Assessee was assessed u/s 153A. AO made addition of Rs.14,73,895 u/s 69C treating furniture expenditure incurred by Assessee’s wife, Smt. Alka Jain, as unexplained. Before CIT(A)/NFAC, Assessee furnished complete evidences—ITRs of wife from AY 2013-14 to AY 2020-21, computation statements & balance sheets—to prove source of funds & her financial capacity. CIT(A)/NFAC accepted that Smt. Alka Jain had sufficient capital & financial strength, but mis-read the balance sheet by treating only cash in hand of Rs.4,24,240 as the available fund &a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930