Sponsored
From the desk of Chairman,CBDT S.N. 35/April 15 ,2011
CBDT compliments one & all for their profound sincerity & deep commitment in issuing record number of refunds in the first 14 days of April 2011 & is confident that the remaining refunds would be issued by 20th April 2011.
Status of refunds issued from April 1 to 14 2011
| RCC | No. of Refunds | Refund Amount in Crs | Refunds entered but not processed. | Refund amount entered but not processed (cr) |
| DELHI | 1,06,389 | 2,716 | 74,363 | 2,803 |
| JAIPUR | 42,226 | 49 | 16,477 | 144 |
| BANGLORE | 40,927 | 43 | 51,580 | 3,114 |
| AHMEDABAD | 39,918 | 51 | 21,884 | 328 |
| CHENNAI | 36,910 | 40 | 27,715 | 1,655 |
| PUNE | 34,220 | 32 | 57,820 | 636 |
| PATIALA | 28,155 | 25 | 12,103 | 212 |
| HYDERABAD | 27,313 | 281 | 40,740 | 989 |
| KOLKATA | 24,877 | 24 | 29,256 | 1,218 |
| ROHTAK | 23,483 | 22 | 26,160 | 301 |
| MEERUT | 20,916 | 19 | 34,488 | 370 |
| BARODA | 20,172 | 27 | 10,960 | 173 |
| NAGPUR | 19,766 | 20 | 9,325 | 114 |
| MUMBAI | 18,001 | 70 | 50,945 | 12,521 |
| JODHPUR | 16,629 | 15 | 16,420 | 170 |
| MADURAI | 16,491 | 17 | 10,381 | 97 |
| BHOPAL | 15,754 | 19 | 27,000 | 165 |
| ALLAHABAD | 12,244 | 13 | 6,858 | 59 |
| RANCHI | 11,919 | 11 | 11,644 | 170 |
| NASIK | 11,807 | 16 | 10,818 | 56 |
| JABALPUR | 10,904 | 11 | 31,791 | 175 |
| VISHAKAPATANAM | 9,578 | 12 | 12,429 | 1,176 |
| LUCKNOW | 8,623 | 8 | 15,423 | 246 |
| COIMBATORE | 8,608 | 12 | 3,361 | 46 |
| SURAT | 8,267 | 10 | 10,870 | 64 |
| PATNA | 7,644 | 8 | 10,860 | 56 |
| AGRA | 6,495 | 5 | 8,844 | 34 |
| BHUBHNESWAR | 6,268 | 6 | 24,099 | 514 |
| KOLHAPUR | 6,252 | 5 | 3,963 | 26 |
| SHILONG | 6,195 | 7 | 7,049 | 661 |
| RAJKOT | 4,361 | 4 | 12,329 | 73 |
| COCHIN | 4,048 | 4 | 14,317 | 179 |
| AMRITSAR | 3,653 | 3 | 6,978 | 63 |
| KANPUR | 3,196 | 2 | 9,870 | 41 |
| TRIVANDRUM | 1,379 | 1 | 22,526 | 114 |
| JALANDHAR | 231 | 0 | 8,431 | 55 |
| Total | 6,63,819 | 3,609 | 7,50,077 | 28,821 |
Most of the regions have done quite well. Few regions, especially Delhi, through meticulous planning & effective management of resources have done exceedingly well. However, few regions continue to lag behind. All the CCITs & CITs of these regions are once again advised to ensure to clear all refunds by April 20 2011.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
What is the procedure to file Grievance Petition??? Can anyone help me out.
i have submitted my sons income tax return through chartered account for the assessment years 2009/10 and 2010/11 for a total refund of Rs38,140.These returns were submitted by efiling on 18-03-10 and on19-07-10 respectively.
My sons PAN no is AJUPN o424G <My sons email id is rangsheel@yahoo.com
Kindly let me know when the refund order will be sent
A R Narayanan
This communication is an effective means of gearing up the department towards faster processing. These are cases filed in FY 2009-1010. Next lot of returns filed in FY 2010-2011 can be processed well in time by July 2011, so that in the later months, only current returns filed in FY 2011-2012 will be processed. It will ensure that returns filed upto February 2012 will be processed by 31-3-2012, and the rest by this time next year, wiping out the pendency for all time to come.
May be The Chairman will issue directions for issue of refunds in cases left out for any reason what so ever.
Well done.
I have to receive refund for 2006-07 .What is to be done.
I have to receive refund for AY 2006-07 .In spite of my repeated pursuations nothing is being happened .Shall we gorget the refunds relating to old periods
I have filed my return of Income for the AY 2010-11 on 27/07/2010 vide Acknowledgement No1511003861 before the Incometax Officer, Ward 15(1), Bangalore claiming a refund of Rs.3,780/ and Interest. So far I have not received the same. My PAN No is ABDPR5791D.
i WOULD BE THANKFUL FOR AN EARLY REFUND.
R NAGARAJA RAO
16/11/2011
Number wise cases in which refund has been processed are 46% and unprocessed are 54%
Amount wise cases in which refund has been processed are just 11.12% .
Average refunded per case is very low at Rs.54368/-
Average of refunds entered but not processed per case is very high at Rs.3,84,241/-
This shows that in fact refund have been processed and actually granted in cases where refund amount was lower and refunds of larger amounts have not been processed.
Market grapevine is that in many cases refunds have not been granted fully. Even amount of refund claimed which is duly supported by report in form 26AS have not been granted and refund of very lower amounts have been sent without giving any reason or intimation. Therefore, the tax payer is in dark as to how the amount of refund has been reduced substantially.
In case of Bangalore, Kolkata, Mumbai, Chennai, vishakhapatanam, Bhubneswar,Cochin, Shilong and many other places refund processed is very low below 3%. In case of Mumbai the position appears worst where refunds processed / granted is just a bit above a half percent (0.56%). Is it indicative of something wrong in financial due to higher TDS and forced collection of disputed dues.
There are many old refunds relating to AY 2006-07 onwards are pending. assessee never know the status of processing of such returns. Assessee feels helpless in such cases. He files letters but many times no reply is recd nor any refund. Assessee got the address changed in NSDL database but the department do not transfer pan according to database of nsdl. what is use of such change effected by NSDL. Need to be done something on it.