If in a case foundation removed, super-structure falls, additions goes

ACIT Vs Sreeleathers (ITAT Kolkata)

Firstly the survey statement has been recorded by DDIT(Inv) in some third party case and not that of assessee. Secondly the deponent has been administered oath before his statement was recorded, which is not in accordance to Section 133A of the Act and the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Khader Khan & Sons (surpa) has held that the statement recorded u/s 133A of the Act is not given evidentiary value for the reason that officer is not authorized to administer oath and to take any sworn statement in contra distinction t

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.