Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Torque Automotive Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1990/Ahd/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/11/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs Torque Automotive Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad)

The brief facts of the case is that the assessee is engaged in the business of sales and services of Skoda cars and spares. The assessee company during this Financial Year has renovated its four showrooms at Ahmedabad, Rajkot, Surat and Baroda as per Skoda Company’s Corporate Identity Look Policy. The assessee had to change the signboard, logo, color, tiles, furniture, etc. completely with that of the old one. Thus, the assessee claimed under repair and maintenance of building expenses account, Rs. 11,29,19,528/-. The Assessing Officer issued a show-cause notice why the renovation expenses of four showrooms should not be treated as capital expenditure and allow appropriate depreciation. In response the assessee replied that it has not brought a new asset in the place of existing asset and there is no structural change to the building. As per the requirements of the Skoda Company, all these renovations are being made for which the Skoda Company offer incentive discount on sale of cars and the above expenses is compensated in due course of its business. The above explanation was not accepted by the Assessing Officer and allowed depreciation of Rs. 81,08,525/- and added balance amount of RS. 10,48,11,003/- as the income of the assessee and also initiated penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act.

The Ld. CIT(A) held that the expenses were incurred for efficiently using the existing space in a better manner and also to suit the principal’s requirement and since no new floor area has been added or any capital asset has come into existence. The expenses on repairs under renovation are allowable as revenue expenditure

On perusal of the material and the facts is the case in Landmark Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. are identical in nature. The Coordinate Bench followed jurisdictional High Court judgment in the case of Desai Bros. (cited Supra) and other High Court judgments. In our considered view this issue is no more res integra. Therefore, respectfully following the ratio of the judgment rendered by the Coordinate Bench in the case of Landmark Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. we have no hesitation in confirming the order passed by the CIT(A) holding that the expenditure incurred by the assessee for renovating its four business showrooms are revenue in nature.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT AHMEDABAD

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031