Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Utkarsha Vivek Parkar (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Utkarsha Vivek Parkar (ITAT Mumbai) AO treated entire purchases ₹28.28L as bogus u/s 69C based on hawala info & made 100% addition. CIT(A) restricted to 12.5%. ITAT held: Sales not doubted → entire purchases cannot be disallowed: Once sales are accepted, corresponding purchases must exist At best grey market purchases – only profit element taxable 12.5% estimation upheld: Consistent with past years & avoids unrealistic GP/NP HC rulings (Kanak Impex / Drisha Impex) distinguished: Those were cases of complete failure / no evidence Result: Revenue appeal dismissed – ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930