Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Karamtara Engineering Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Karamtara Engineering Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Bogus Purchase Addition Restricted to 5% – Sales Accepted & Banking Trail Proven – Full Disallowance Not Sustainable – ITAT Mumbai AO treated purchases as bogus based on Sales Tax Dept information, non-service of notices u/s 133(6) and non-compliance of summons, and made 100% addition. CIT(A) restricted addition to 5% in some AYs while dispute continued for other years. Assessee demonstrated ledger accounts, invoices, delivery challans, goods inward notes and banking payments; sales were accepted and books were not rejected. ITAT he...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031