Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Karamtara Engineering Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Karamtara Engineering Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Bogus Purchase Addition Restricted to 5% – Sales Accepted & Banking Trail Proven – Full Disallowance Not Sustainable – ITAT Mumbai AO treated purchases as bogus based on Sales Tax Dept information, non-service of notices u/s 133(6) and non-compliance of summons, and made 100% addition. CIT(A) restricted addition to 5% in some AYs while dispute continued for other years. Assessee demonstrated ledger accounts, invoices, delivery challans, goods inward notes and banking payments; sales were accepted and books were not rejected. ITAT he...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031