No Bar U/s. 245R(2)(i) merely due to notice asking applicant to produce any evidence in support of its return

CIT Vs Authority for Advance Ruling (Delhi High Court)

The issue under consideration is whether the question raised in the notice under Section 143(2) can be stated to be ‘pending’ to attract clause (i) of the proviso to Section 245R(2) of the Act?

In the present case, the petitioner i.e CIT argues that since the questions raised in the Application before the AAR were already pending before the Assessing Officer, the AAR was barred from assuming jurisdiction in

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.