Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Assessee is entitled to deduction 43B based on the tax audit report even though no supporting evidence for payment was produced before the AO

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2011 taxguru.in 712
Case Name
ACIT, New Delhi Vs Indian Farmer Fertilisers Co- op Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2005– 2006
Courts
ITAT Delhi
Advertisement

ACIT, New Delhi Vs Indian Farmer Fertilisers Co- op Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)- From the tax audit report, we also find that amount of Rs. 13,03,74,047/- has been shown as paid on or before due date for furnishing return of income for the previous year u/s 139(1) of the Act. Form 3CD has been prepared and signed by Rajnish & Associates, CA. The accounts of the assessee have been audited by statutory auditors. The assessee had filed the details of payment of Rs. 13,03,74,047/-. The assessee is entitled for deduction u/s 43B of the Act in respect of amount of Rs. 13,03,74,047/-. Accordingly, we do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the CIT(A) deleting the addition made u/s 43B of the Act.

Business expenditure and  Principle of consistency – Assessee is entitled to deduction u/s. 37 for provision for contribution of administrative expenses of Coop. Education fund as per Multi State Co-operative Society as in the preceding years, the AO itself allowed such claim and without any material change it cannot be rejected.

Expenses cannot be disallowed @ 100% of the exempted income earned and the dis-allowance was rightly restricted as per Rule 8D.

ACIT Vs Indian Farmer Fertilisers Coop Ltd

Decided by – ITAT Delhi

ITA Nos. 3350/Del/2009

and 1194/Del/2011

AYs- 2005– 2006

and 2006–2007

Decided on: 31 May 2011.

ORDER

PER K.D. RAJNAN, AM

These appeals by the Revenue for assessment years 2005- 06 & 06- 07 arise from separate order of CIT(A)-XXII, New Delhi. These appeals were heard together and for the sake of convenience are disposed of by this common order.

I.T.A. No. 1194/Del./201 1

2. The first issue for consideration relates to deleting the addition of Rs 13,03,74,047/- made u/s 43B of the Act. The facts of the case stated in brief are that the AO from tax audit report found that a sum of Rs. 23,98,96,527/- has been shown payable as on 31.03.06. The tax audit report also stated that a sum of Rs. 13,03,74,047/- on account  of payments of these liabilities had been added back and the balance amount of Rs. 10,95,22,480/-. The assessee was required to produce evidence for payment of liabilities. However, since assessee did not file any evidence, he disallowed the amount of Rs. 13,03,74,047/- u/s 43B of the Act.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.