Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sri Shashi Parvatha Reddy Vs. DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 392/Hyd/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/10/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sri Shashi Parvatha Reddy Vs. Dy. CIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

Coming to the second category of shares i.e. the original and the bonus shares transferred to the assessee by the overseas investors without any cost attached to them, we find that the original shares were initially purchased or acquired by the overseas investors by way of inward remittances of foreign exchange and they were also allotted the bonus shares on the original shares. As held by us in the above paragraphs, the bonus shares acquire the character of the original shares acquired by the overseas investors.

Coming to their transfer to the assessee, the assessing officer has accepted the assets as long term capital assets by taking into consideration the period of holding of the overseas investors also. Having done so, it is not open to the assessing officer to treat the said asset as acquired without any cost by the assessee. Since the assessee has received the asset without any cost, it has to be treated as a gift and the cost of acquisition of the previous owner has to be treated as a cost of acquisition to the assessee. In view of the same, the original shares acquired by the assessee from the overseas investors are also foreign exchange assets under section 115E of the Act and the cost of acquisition of the earlier owners has to be allowed as cost of acquisition of the assessee while computing the long term capital gain. Further, with regards to the capital gain on the sale of bonus shares, our findings in the above paragraphs with regard to the bonus and shares acquired by the assessee hold good even for these shares. The findings of the assessing officer that the assessee has got the bonus shares allotted to him and his father only to avoid tax is not based on any evidence.

Though the assessee had submitted before the Commissioner (Appeals) that the overseas investors had transferred the assets to the assessee due to non fulfillment of certain conditions, the Commissioner (Appeals) has not considered any of these arguments and has not found them to be untrue. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the shares sold by the assessee have been treated as long term capital assets and being the assets acquired by way of foreign exchange fall within the definition of foreign exchange asset under section 115 E(b) of the Act and the assessee is eligible for a concessional rate of 10% under section 115E of the Act.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031