Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vishnu Ganpat Gaikwad Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vishnu Ganpat Gaikwad Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Clerical Error in Form 35 Shouldn’t Kill Appeal: Tribunal Sends Matter Back to CIT(A)- CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss in Limine: Must Decide Merits u/s 250(6) Assessee, an agriculturist & one of several Vahivatdars in a large land acquisition dispute, filed appeal before ITAT with a delay of 258 days. Condonation application explained that more than ₹62 crore of enhanced compensation had been blocked in FDRs since 2016 due to challenge by SLAO before Bombay High Court, causing continuous litigation, multiple proceedings before Charity Commissioner & ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld No Exempt Income = No U/s 14A Disallowance – ITAT Bangalore Reaffirms Settled Law ITAT Bangalore Quashes Sec 263 Revision: No Error in Valuation & No Need to Initiate Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930