This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Appeal Restored After Clerical Error by Consultant Led to Wrong Delay Declaration
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Vishnu Ganpat Gaikwad Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Vishnu Ganpat Gaikwad Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Clerical Error in Form 35 Shouldn’t Kill Appeal: Tribunal Sends Matter Back to CIT(A)- CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss in Limine: Must Decide Merits u/s 250(6)
Assessee, an agriculturist & one of several Vahivatdars in a large land acquisition dispute, filed appeal before ITAT with a delay of 258 days. Condonation application explained that more than ₹62 crore of enhanced compensation had been blocked in FDRs since 2016 due to challenge by SLAO before Bombay High Court, causing continuous litigation, multiple proceedings before Charity Commissioner & ...
Author Info
