Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Wave field Inseis ASA, In re (Authority for Advance Rulings)
Appeal Number : A.A.R. No. 844 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/03/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

RELEVANT PARAGRAPH

1. The applicant is a company incorporated in Norway has filed this application under section 245Q (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as `IT Act’) seeking advance ruling on the following questions:

1.1 Whether on the stated facts and in law the income derived by Master and Commander AS (`M&C) ought to be computed in accordance with the computational mechanism under section 44BB of the Act?

2. If the answer to question no.1 is in affirmative, what would be the rate at which tax is to be withheld from payments made by the applicant to M&C?

1.3. Whether on the stated facts and in the circumstances of the case, even if the consideration for the services provided by M&C is construed to be in the nature of `Royalty’ or `Fees for technical services’ under Article 13 of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and Norway (`tax treaty’) nevertheless, the income chargeable to tax ought to be computed having regard to the computational mechanism under section 44BB of the Act?

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031