Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Ms Orient Express (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brief of the case: Madras High Court held in CIT V/s Ms Orient Express that the amendment to sec 80HHC would have prospective effect from 2005 not retrospective effect. Facts of the case: The assessee was engaged in the manufacturing business of Leather and leather garments and claimed deduction u/s 80HHC for A.Y 1999-2000 but AO denied the same on the basis that the amended provisions of sec 80HHC of IT Act which would have retrospective effect had not been fulfilled. Contention of the assessee: Assessee was of the view that all the conditions were fulfilled so it was eligible to deduction u/...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930