Case Law Details
Case Name : CIT Vs Ms Orient Express (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Madras High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brief of the case:
Madras High Court held in CIT V/s Ms Orient Express that the amendment to sec 80HHC would have prospective effect from 2005 not retrospective effect.
Facts of the case:
The assessee was engaged in the manufacturing business of Leather and leather garments and claimed deduction u/s 80HHC for A.Y 1999-2000 but AO denied the same on the basis that the amended provisions of sec 80HHC of IT Act which would have retrospective effect had not been fulfilled.
Contention of the assessee:
Assessee was of the view that all the conditions were fulfilled so it was eligible to deduction u/...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

