This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No addition for unexplained cash deposit if Sale amount exceeds cash deposit in bank
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Virender Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Virender Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Ld.CIT(A) sustained the addition of Rs.3,67,000/- on the ground that the assessee could not substantiate with evidence of sales and cash deposits made at Jam Nagar, Delhi and Jaipur and, therefore, cash deposits of Rs.3,16,000/- at Jaipur and Rs. 15,000/- at Jam Nagar and Rs.36,000/- at Delhi were sustained by the CIT(A). A perusal of the order of the CIT(A) shows that the assessee, before the AO, while explaining cash deposit at Jam Nagar, had submitted that an amount of Rs.10,000/- dated 03.09.2010 and Rs.5,000/- dated 20.01.2011 were depos...
