Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjeev Kumar Saxena Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjeev Kumar Saxena Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow) The Lucknow SMC Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow Bench partly allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2015-16 and deleted the addition of ₹11,59,091 made under section 56(2)(vii)(b) on account of alleged difference between stamp-duty value and actual purchase consideration of immovable property. The Assessing Officer had invoked section 56(2)(vii)(b) (read with section 50C principles) without making a mandatory reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO), despite a specific request by the assessee disputing the stamp-duty...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930