Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) Deleted for Want of DVO Reference: ITAT Lucknow Quashes ₹11.59 Lakh Addition

Case Law Details

Case Name
Sanjeev Kumar Saxena Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement
Sanjeev Kumar Saxena Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow) The Lucknow SMC Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow Bench partly allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2015-16 and deleted the addition of ₹11,59,091 made under section 56(2)(vii)(b) on account of alleged difference between stamp-duty value and actual purchase consideration of immovable property. The Assessing Officer had invoked section 56(2)(vii)(b) (read with section 50C principles) without making a mandatory reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO), despite a specific request by the assessee disputing the stamp-duty...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *