Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Addition u/s. 2(22)(e) deleted as advance was recorded as journal entry and no sum was received

Case Law Details

Case Name
Ramesh Nagindas Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2013-14
Advertisement
Ramesh Nagindas Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition u/s. 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act is liable to be set aside since advance was received was merely recorded as journal entry and no sum was received by the assessee. Thus, appeal allowed. Facts- During the course of assessment proceedings, AO observed that the assessee was a director and substantial shareholder in M/s. Mahavir Submersible Pvt. Ltd., holding 49.71% of the total shares amounting to ₹35,00,000/-. AO noted that the assessee had received a loan of ₹65,22,947/- from the aforesaid company and observed...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *