Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Anshika Consultants Pvt. Ltd. (High Court of Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Addition u/s 68 merely for reason of higher premium claimed is not valid if assessee has proved its onus of creditworthiness and genuineness of transaction Brief facts of the Case The assessee in the instant case issued shares at a premium ranging from Rs.24000-39000 to some applicant companies. During the assessment proceedings, AO sought details of such applicants which in turn was provided by the assessee in the form of their bank account statements, the Memorandum and Articles of Association, Income Tax Return, Balance Sheets, PAN details etc. However, the notices issued by the AO to conce...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930