This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
UPVAT Act: Revisional jurisdiction does not empower HCs to revaluate factual evidence
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Commissioner, Commercial Tax U.P. Lucknow Vs D.I.C. India Ltd. (Allahabad High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Allahabad High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Commissioner, Commercial Tax U.P. Lucknow Vs D.I.C. India Ltd. (Allahabad High Court)
In the case of Commissioner, Commercial Tax U.P. Lucknow Vs D.I.C. India Ltd., the Allahabad High Court addressed the scope of revision jurisdiction under the UPVAT Act, focusing on the classification of “cello” under the definition of capital goods.
The dispute revolved around whether the cello used by the assessee qualified as capital goods under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 (UPVAT Act). The revisionist argued that the cello was merely a movable container used for ink storage and ...
Author Info
