Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Flint Group India Private Limited (GST AAR Gujarat)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/2019/22
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/09/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Flint Group India Private Limited (GST AAR Gujarat)

The applicant has submitted that their product, ‘Technical varnish’, “Medium’ or ‘tinting ink’ should not be treated anything other than printing ink. The ‘Printing ink’ manufactured and supplied by them fall under Chapter Heading 3215 of GST Tariff. The Tariff Heading 3215 reads as follows:-

“All Goods, including printing ink, writing or drawing ink and other inks, whether or not concentrated or solid, fountain pen ink, ball pen ink”

We find that the Tariff Heading 3215 covers all Goods, including printing ink, writing or drawing ink and other inks, whether or not concentrated or solid, fountain pen ink, ball pen ink. As the ‘Varnishes’ are different than “Printing ink” and are specifically covered under Tariff Heading 3208, the same do not fall under Tariff Heading 3215.

We also find that during the erstwhile Central Excise regime, in excise returns, they had classified their manufacturing items, “Printing ink (both black & others)” under Chapter sub-heading no. 3215 11 90; “Medium” under Chapter sub-heading no. 3208 90 11; and “Varnish” under Chapter subheading no. 3209 10 10.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031